Unless I’m missing something, the points that you get under the limited value for Stamina are not better than the infinite one, when it should be? Was this one supposed to be 7 points per Stamina spent? Looking at how the Diamonds score is, it definitely seems like the numbers are inverted or just wrong, but I don’t have an old one to compare it to.
They aren’t better, but that has been the case for a while now I think. It is just that you get a little extra for the first several hunderdthousand stamina you spend. So you get more than if it were not there, but of course it would have been better if it was spending 1 stamina gave 2 points for example. Sadly we are not that lucky…
To be fair, it kinda should have been different.
Spend 1 Stamina should be limited to, say, 950k points.
950k Stamina spent should get you additional 50k points.
So “Spend 19 Stamina” should be infinite.
Or like…
1 Stamina limited to 999k points.
And 1M stamina getting the additional 1k. So “Spend 1000 stamina” would be infinite.
Above 1M it really does not matter what the scoring is. Either it will be bloated way over 1M or stay in the vicinity of 1M.
I’d actually prefer the latter.
But why limit the worst one though? So does that mean that the 1 and 7 ones are in the wrong places among each other? Seems like 7 would have been the infinite one. Though if the point values are never different, then it shouldn’t affect much, so not a HUGE mixup then since it wouldn’t help people get to 1m faster.
Do you really want a limit on the “1 point per stamina”, and have the “1/7 point per stamina” be infinite?
1 Like
If the “1 point per stamina” is capped to, say, 900K… sure why not.
Again, points above 1M or rather… their scaling… does not matter AT ALL.
1 Like