“They’re” should be “Their.”
On all of the subway backgrounds where the newsstand is shown: “stationary” is shown as a newsstand product. Paper for letter and note writing is “stationery” spelled with an e as in “envelope.”
“Stationary” refers to something that does not move or stays in the space it is located in.
The wrong form of the word is used in that background.
All in the same chapter…
There should be a comma after Enraged.
“But” at the beginning of a sentence like this is poor structure.
The comma should be a semicolon or something else to break up the sentence.
I think this sounds okay when spoken, but I really tripped over myself the first seven times I read it, so I don’t know… Maybe it is just me
Well “more better” is a grammatical error I think
That was what I was talking about, I could say it out loud and it sounds alright, I guess but it really bothers me typed out.
Actually to not is proper grammar while not to is modern
Nope . When using an infinitive e.g. to use, to do, etc. placing a word between the ‘to’ and the verb is an error, it’s called splitting the infinitive.
To be or not to be
Its used in theater and poetry
You said I was wrong and now you have evidence backing up my point. Which side are you on?
I think either way is accurate?
As far as I know the right one is “not to”
It is, because of why @Fellow_Piglet said. It’s quite a formal rule though, so the wrong version is commonly seen - it’s not a ‘glaring’ error
Although technically speaking ”to not ” is not correct it’s a split infinitive—it’s perfectly acceptable in ordinary usage in writing. It depends on the context, rhythm and style of the sentence. Generally speaking, “ not to” is used more in colloquial English.
I am not saying not to is wrong but to not is acceptable
If the “an” is going to be there, then “souls” should be singular.
A couple errors from the Flynn/Rapunzel Campaign
Should be “Much to her dismay”.
His name is spelled Pascal.
What the heck. Pasqual??
She hits herself with the pan too many times…