I still don’t get why you guys keep trying to reply him. He’s going to keep doing it the more we care.
Best medicine is ignore, flag and move on.
Three?(20 characters)
Scar hades malificent kevin flyn ursula and gaston are dead but still got added meaning charther doesnt need to be alive to be added and bil cipher s target was much worse than any vilian disney made the only vilian who could be maybe stronger is maybe the charnerborg
List of villains strongest to weakest (imo).
#1: Jafar
I support Jafar as being the most physically powerful Disney villain. When Genie was forced into making Jafar a sorcerer, he didn’t just wish to be any old wizard. He actually wished to become the most powerful sorcerer in existence. This alone was kind of enough for me to put him at the top of my list. His abilities as a sorcerer are shown in the climax to be very powerful, allowing him to control and move objects with his staff, and who can forget him turning into a 50-foot cobra to fight Aladdin. That’s pretty freaking powerful.
#2: Maleficent
I think we can all agree that Maleficent terrified us a bit as a child. Either that or I’m just pathetic. Maleficent’s sorcery is second only to Jafar (and you think second is enough? -Jafar 2019) being the most powerful sorcerer in the world. Other than that, Maleficent tops it. She can do everything from create massive storms, eternal curses, and morph into a monstrous dragon.
#3: Hades
I mean, he’s a literal God. That being said, I don’t think there’s any way I could put him below #3. If you’ve seen Hercules, you’ll know that Hades has both pyrokinesis, telekinesis, and a suave, car salesman-type mood (most of the time.) Plus, his ability to make deals with his enemies, which may not work with some higher intelligence villains, could sap away their power, making it much easier to defeat them.
#4(tie) Ursula
I really couldn’t decide between Ursula and Shadowman. I thought that yes, Ursula in her giant form would surely crush Facilier. But, Ursula doesn’t really permanently hold the title of the King/Queen, which is what made me sure that Facilier would defeat her in her natural form using voodoo. Then it just ended up in a draw because I couldn’t decide. Sorry.
#4(tie): : Dr. Facilier
Look above.
#5: Scar
Note how Scar is above Frollo and Gothel. They’re the only two humans on this list who don’t have any otherworldly powers (Facilier can harness his voodoo and powers with dark magic and such, same with Jafar.) But Scar, even though he’s a lion, is also one of the most intelligent villains. And, one thing I’ve learned in Disney is that smart characters tend to win more. And plus, I don’t think there’s a single human who could wrestle a lion alive. Definitely not Frollo, who looks like he’s in his 70s.
#6: Frollo
Don’t get me wrong – Frollo is downright terrifying. He is, without question, one of the scariest and realistic villains in Disney. But in terms of physical power, Frollo’s power is really only upheld by his title in the church, as a Grand Judge. However, he did give Quasimodo a run for his money during the final duel atop Norte Dame, where he almost slashed him multiple times with a sword, and nearly dragged him to his death. Yikes.
#7: Gothel
Look, I’m sorry. I’m sorry, Gothel. Watching Tangled for the first time about a year ago, I thought, “Wow. This is basically a peppier version of THoND.” And that’s why I put her below. Both Frollo and Gothel derives their power from fear. It’s just that Frollo did it much better. Gothel, aside from telling Rapunzel the world was dark and cruel, actually seemed nice to Rapunzel growing up. Frollo was just a heartless old terrorist who constantly told Quasimodo that he was worthless to the world. Gothel didn’t really seem threatening to me. She wouldn’t last a minute against most of these villains above.
Hopefully I can help strike up more conversation.
Like your list, yet I’m not sure about Maleficent over Hades. I mean, a god and a fairy. Hades is immortal, Maleficent can be killed.
You uneducated swine
His name is Chernabog
Woah! That was savage!
Uh… That wasn’t cursing exactly
Let’s not start fighting…
True that. In a scrapped version of The Lion King, Scar was actually successful in throwing Simba off the cliff and then he would laugh maniacally (before or during when he would be consumed by the fire), but Simba still lived
I think Scar is the only villain who had actually fully succeeded.
This went right over my head as a kid, but the whole time Simba was being raised by Timon & Pumbaa, Scar was the King. I’m not familiar with a lion’s lifespan, but . . . Wow. Scar was King for so long. If Scar hadn’t told Simba the truth just before killing him, he would have won.
You forgot about the blue wisps… They’re the most successful villains of them all!!
Still don’t know what’s their reason though
Google says that lion cubs become adults in 3 years, so, I guess it’s the time Scar had ruled. The lifespan is 15 years, like other cats, so yes, Scar had heen a king for a large part of his life
Ursula kinda succeeded too…
True, but Ursula’s was only for a very short amount of time. Scar succeeded for years. I’ve heard there’s a fanfic book about what happened if Ursula truly succeeded, which I’m thinking of looking at.
Yep Disney has a a line of Twisted Tales that’s basically what if the hero lost and the villain won? They seem interesting.
They do seem really interesting. I love the how titles are references to songs, the Aladdin one being “A Whole New World”, and The Little Mermaid’s being “Part of Your World,” which both seem deliciously evil. I would love one on the Lion King for something like: “Circle of Life: What if Simba was killed in the stampede?”
really you want to kick out mother gothel for kidnapping but what about the others?
like gaston was a sexist. and maleficent gave a baby a curse for not even being invited to the royal clebreation.
Well we all can relate to Maleficent, right?
Oh no, Gaston had the same bias as many people of his era, what an awful, terrible villain!
He really wasn’t evil. He was just a jerk.
no much worse he thought women had no right to think or to read.